The Babylonian creation story repeats many of the details of the Biblical account but clearly is not the source of that account. The striking parallels constitute a strong argument against the framework hypothesis defended by Meredith Kline and his adherents. The Babylonian story presents the creation in terms of a consecutive story, with striking details in the same order as the Biblical account, but clearly not with the same “characters” or “actors” and not in a “framework.”
Similar Posts
Vos Made Easier – New Testament Biblical Theology a la Geerhardus Vos
Posted onI have long recognized Geerhardus Vos as one of the most accomplished authors in the field of Biblical theology … I did recommend…
New Directions In Biblical Theology
Posted onThe New Two Kingdom Doctrine and the New Republication Doctrine.
Klinism and the Westminster Standards
Posted onConsider the question, “What difference does it make if we accept what the advocates of Klinism are saying regarding the new doctrine of…
Old Testament Biblical Theology I: Introductory Matters
Posted onOld Testament biblical theology is a very interesting and engrossing subject because it deals with the specifics of the biblical revelation stage by…
Baptism: How and Who
Posted onThere are two issues regarding Christian baptism on which much discussion focuses: the method (the how) of baptism and its recipients (the who)….
Old Testament Biblical Theology II: From Adam to Adam
Posted onThis book opens with a survey of the matters of prolegomena to biblical theology. Then after a discussion of certain introductory items, it…
